Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable

On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 01:35 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> According to some reports, and a quick test I did on my laptop, this 
> same method appears to work on the ICH4 chipset, even though the HPET is 
> not documented on that chipset. Does Intel have any info on HPET support 
> on ICH4 and whether there's any reason we should not force enable it 
> there as well?

There is a patch for ICH4 in my hrt queue:

http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable
  - From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: why does git perpetually complain about include/asm-blackfin/macros.h?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable
Next by thread: signalfd() semantics after execve()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]