Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable

On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 01:35 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> According to some reports, and a quick test I did on my laptop, this 
> same method appears to work on the ICH4 chipset, even though the HPET is 
> not documented on that chipset. Does Intel have any info on HPET support 
> on ICH4 and whether there's any reason we should not force enable it 
> there as well?

There is a patch for ICH4 in my hrt queue:

http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: why does git perpetually complain about include/asm-blackfin/macros.h?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable
• Next by thread: signalfd() semantics after execve()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]