Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:47 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > I fear the consequences of this change :(
> 
> I love it.  In the past I've lost time by working with patches which
> didn't quite realize that ext3 holds a transaction open during
> ->direct_IO.
> 
> > Oh well, please keep it alive, maybe beat on it a bit, resend it
> > later on?
> 
> I can test the patch to make sure that it catches mistakes I've made in
> the past. 

That would be much appreciated.

>  Peter, do you have any interest in seeing how far we can get
> at tracking lock_page()?  I'm not holding my breath, but any little bit
> would probably help.

Yeah I'm going to try that one next.. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
    • From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
  • Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: signalfd() semantics after execve()
• Next by Date: Re: why does git perpetually complain about include/asm-blackfin/macros.h?
• Previous by thread: Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
• Next by thread: Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]