Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:54:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:09:54 +0200
> 
> > This patch contains the following cleanups:
> > - note in the prompt if an option depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> > - remove "default n"s that didn't have any effect
> > - remove "default m"s from options under TCP_CONG_ADVANCED:
> >   if you manually choose congestion control modules you should
> >   know which ones you want
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> 
> I'm not so sure about any of this, sorry Adrian, I'm
> not applying this.

What exactly are you not sure of?
- noting the experimental status in the prompt is a common convention
  in the kernel
- "default n"s like here are nops serving no purpose

This leaves only the removal of the "default m"s which I thought would 
be non-controversial since people seeing these options should know best
what they need.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux