Hi Andrew, After refactoring of architecture independant code (mutex to protect text edition) vs architecture dependant code (marking/unmarking pages RW) and thorough testing, here is the new version of the text edit lock. Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/8] Text Edit Lock
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [patch 8/8] Text Edit Lock - kprobes x86_64
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 7/8] Text Edit Lock - kprobes i386
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 6/8] Text Edit Lock - Kprobes architecture independent support
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/8] Kprobes - do not use kprobes mutex in arch code
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 4/8] Text Edit Lock - x86_64
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 5/8] Text Edit Lock - Alternative code for i386 and x86_64
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 2/8] Text Edit Lock - Architecture Independent Code
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 3/8] Text Edit Lock - i386
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/8] Text Edit Lock
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Use --build-id ld option
- Next by Date: [patch 3/8] Text Edit Lock - i386
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
- Next by thread: [patch 3/8] Text Edit Lock - i386
- Index(es):
 |