From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
> But the code modified here is x86_64 and i386 specific? Is there an
> overlap?
I see, the acessor is abstracted via a function.
That seems pointless, and allows you to do things like this, improving
the implementation on one set of platforms yet leave others using
SMT/multi-core scheduling behind.
It makes a lot more sense to make the implementation consistent
and therefore the improvements are seen on every platform.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]