On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:59 PDT, Mike Anderson said: > No, all admin tools and interfaces function as they do today. The > dm-netlink patch series only contains 9 deletions (actual just one true > deletion of existing kernel code the others are due to break up of the > patch into compilable chunks). The intent was not to break users or force > migration. OK, I'll bite - if the admin tools function as before, who is *using* the code? Or do the admin tools have a preferred netlink component and a fallback set of code if that fails?
Attachment:
pgpsqAjb48rMw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- From: Mike Anderson <[email protected]>
- [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- Prev by Date: RE : Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 5/6] ps3: BD/DVD/CD-ROM Storage Driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
- Index(es):