Re: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:59 PDT, Mike Anderson said:

> No, all admin tools and interfaces function as they do today. The
> dm-netlink patch series only contains 9 deletions (actual just one true
> deletion of existing kernel code the others are due to break up of the
> patch into compilable chunks). The intent was not to break users or force
> migration.

OK, I'll bite - if the admin tools function as before, who is *using* the
code?  Or do the admin tools have a preferred netlink component and a fallback
set of code if that fails?

Attachment: pgpsqAjb48rMw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
    • From: Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
    • From: Mike Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE : Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 5/6] ps3: BD/DVD/CD-ROM Storage Driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]