Re: [PATCH 015 of 20] knfsd: nfsd4: make readonly access depend on pseudoflavor

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:12:15 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:27:49 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
> > 
> > Allow readonly access to vary depending on the pseudoflavor, using the
> > flag passed with each pseudoflavor in the export downcall.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
> > 
> > ### Diffstat output
> >  ./include/linux/nfsd/export.h |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff .prev/include/linux/nfsd/export.h ./include/linux/nfsd/export.h
> > --- .prev/include/linux/nfsd/export.h	2007-07-10 11:40:31.000000000 +1000
> > +++ ./include/linux/nfsd/export.h	2007-07-10 11:50:43.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> >  #define NFSEXP_ALLFLAGS		0xFE3F
> >  
> >  /* The flags that may vary depending on security flavor: */
> > -#define NFSEXP_SECINFO_FLAGS	0
> > +#define NFSEXP_SECINFO_FLAGS	NFSEXP_READONLY
> >  
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >  
> 
> You have two patches called "knfsd: nfsd4: make readonly access depend on
> pseudoflavor".  This one appears to have the wrong title and changelog.

hm, I ended up accidentally losing this patch altogether.  But
knfsd-nfsd-enforce-per-flavor-id-squashing.patch rubs out its effects, so
we end up OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/