On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 20:40 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:02 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 19:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > We know very well and Ingo nowhere said, that this is not a perfect
> > > queue, but it was and still is _our_ work base and we opened it up for
> > > the reasons explained.
> >
> > Easy Thomas .. I was just trying to be helpful ..
>
> Think for a minute:
>
> > I haven't really been submitting much to -rt mainly because there was
> > no broken out set ..
>
> Now you expect, that we are completely excited because you condescend to
> work with us from one minute to the other ?
I'm not "condecending" to anything. I was personally discouraged .. If I
was you I'd re-evaluate my position. You should _thrive_ on more
developers working with your, instead of trying to discourage people (by
sending email like this) .. I won't be discouraged by your nasty emails.
Just so this isn't a a totally negative thread, I'll take this
opportunity to again thank you and Ingo for release a broken out set. I
appreciate it, and I'm sure many other people do as well.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]