Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.22.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nish Aravamudan ([email protected]) wrote:
> On 7/12/07, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining
> > it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not mentioned in the
> > release notes :)
> 
> Fair enough -- it's just a little bit easier from my side for
> mirroring to only have to mirror one tree rather simply rather than
> pulling multiple trees into one (and thus having to add to the list as
> time goes on).
> 
> > I'll let Chris decide if he wishes to maintain it or not, Chris?

Nish, I think you might be the only user ;-)  I never figured out a nice
way to do this w/out having a coherency issue (well, triggers aside).
Ideally git would allow for something more transparent than
alternatives, actual moving view to another tree.  It's possible with
links, but that seems just dirty.  Short of that, do folks find the tree
useful?  If so, I can work on some better automation to keep it
up-to-date.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux