On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:41 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > there seems to be something wrong with the way the CFS balances (or does not
> > balance) RT tasks. This was evidenced using the sched_football testcase
> > available from the RT wiki (http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/IBM_Test_Cases)
> > which I modified and attached to this mail.
> >
> > The testcase starts a number of threads which fall into 3 categories:
> >
> > 1 referee thread: SCHED_FIFO, RT prio 5
> > ncpus defensive threads: SCHED_FIFO, RT prio 4
> > ncpus offensive threads: SCHED_FIFO, RT prio 3
> >
> > (ncpus being the number of CPUs)
> >
> > To make a long story short, the defensive threads should end up distributed
> > among all CPUs, but that's not the case. For example, on a dual HT Xeon box,
> > after task migration stabilizes we have the following running on the different
> > CPUs:
> >
> > CPU 0: defense2
> > CPU 1: referee offense2 offense3 offense4 defense3
> > CPU 2: offense1
> > CPU 3: defense1 defense4
> >
> > which clearly show the imbalance between CPU 2 and CPU 3 where offense1
> > should not be allowed to run while the higher prio defense1 and defense4
> > are sharing the same CPU.
> >
> > The following patch fixes this by re-enabling the RT overload detection
> > for the CFS. It may not be the right solution, maybe it should be incorporated
> > into the other load balancing mechanisms. I did not digg deep enough yet
> > to make that call ;-)
>
> 2.6.21.5-rt20 plus this patch passed 1000 runs of the standard
> sched_football on an 8 processor (quad dual-core) x86-64 box. Nice
> work.
Hmmm, seems I spoke a bit too soon; due to a bug in the test log
checker, the test failed but the log checker said PASS. Actual results:
$ grep 'Final ball position' rt-tests.log | sort | uniq -c
960 Final ball position: 0
39 Final ball position: 1
1 Final ball position: 2
So it failed 4% of the runs. However, it failed much less
spectacularly; rather than overrunning the integer maximum, it only
reached 1-2. Still a huge improvement despite not solving the problem
completely.
> > The RT overload mechanism of the O(1) scheduler has not been activated
> > in the new CFS.
> >
> > This patch fixes that by inserting calls to inc_rt_tasks() and dec_rt_tasks()
> > in enqueue_task_rt() and dequeue_task_rt() respectively, which enables the
> > balance_rt_tasks() to be run in the rt_overload case.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
Ack still valid despite the above.
- Josh Triplett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
