On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:07:59PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> > > + return __pci_alloc_consistent(dev, size, dma, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >
> > I was going to ask you why that needs to be GFP_ATOMIC on Alpha.
> > But find you're following the example of asm-generic and others.
> > So really should be asking Sparc how it gets away with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> According to DMA-mapping.txt GFP_ATOMIC is mandatory for
> pci_alloc_consistent() since it can be called from interrupt context.
> So sparc code is probably incorrect...
Hi Bill, we've veered away from the original topic, and are wondering
how the sparc32 pci_alloc_consistent() gets away with using GFP_KERNEL,
when GFP_ATOMIC seems to be required?
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
