Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Yes, got it, but forgot to reply to myself. But thanks for your confirmation
> of my understanding.

:)

> I believe both patches are nice.

Is there anything I should be doing now to get these patches in?

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockup debugging
  - From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
  - From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
  - From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFT][PATCH v7] sata_mv: convert to new EH
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][ACPI][BUTTON] remove procfs-interface
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: debug flushing deadlocks with lockdep
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]