Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Yes, got it, but forgot to reply to myself. But thanks for your confirmation
> of my understanding.

:)

> I believe both patches are nice.

Is there anything I should be doing now to get these patches in?

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockup debugging
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFT][PATCH v7] sata_mv: convert to new EH
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][ACPI][BUTTON] remove procfs-interface
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: debug work related deadlocks with lockdep
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: debug flushing deadlocks with lockdep
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]