On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Odd, I looked at the patchset fairly closely a number of times, as I was
> hand-retrofitting the -rc[1-4] versions onto -rc[1-4]-mm kernels, and it looked
> to *me* like it was a nice set of 20 or so step-by-step changes (bisectable
> and everything - I got to do that once trying to figure out which one I botched).
> Was there something in there that I missed?
The patch-set itself actually looks fine, as far as I'm concerned.
But it does seem to have that "enable everything in one go" problem.
I'd much rather see one time source at a time being converted, and enabled
then and there, so that when people report problems and do a bisection, if
it was HPET that broke, you get the commit that changed HPET.
As it is, looking at that set, it *looks* like you'd get the "ok, now
enable it all" as the commit that breaks, which tells you hardly anything,
since the commit that _shows_ the behaviour has absolutely nothing to do
with the code that actually causes it.
But yeah, the patch series per se doesn't look bad. If it wasn't for me
being burnt by the last big switch-over for timers, I probably wouldn't
mind it at all, personally.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
