Andi,
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > What contribution do we have from you instead? A week before the .23
>
> I told him my objections privately earlier. Basically i would
> like to see an actually debuggable step-by-step change, not a rip everything
> out.
You promised privately to do a thorough review as well, which I'm still
waiting for since months.
> If that isn't possible it needs very careful review which just hasn't
> happened yet. But I'm not convinced even step by step is not possible
> here.
There is no step by step thing. You convert an arch to clock events or
you convert it not.
> I thought it was clear that rip everything out is rarely a good idea
> in Linux land? That's really not something I should need to harp on
> repeatedly.
If you have technical objections, put them on the table. Point by point.
All I heard so far from you are platitudes, which are not worth the
electrons to transport them.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
