Randy,
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 14:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> I certainly haven't. I can barely keep up with reading about 1/2
> of lkml emails. And in my non-scientific method, I think that we
> are suffering from both (a) more patch submittals and (b) fewer
> qualified reviewers (per kernel KLOC) than we had 3-5 years ago.
>
> I don't see how you can expect Andrew to review these or any other
> specific patchset. Do you have some suggestions on how to clone
> Andrew?
Ingo was talking to Andi, the x86_64 maintainer, not to Andrew.
And I share his opinion that the maintainer of the subsystem, which is
affected by such a fundamental patch, could have at least shown any
public sign of interest, disgust, comment or what ever in a 3+ month
time frame.
Especially about a patch, which is a logical consequence of an almost
two years public and transparent effort to consolidate the time code in
the kernel.
I for my part have no problem maintaining the set for another round out
of tree and weed out eventually problems in -mm, but my expectation for
qualified response of the responsible maintainer is exactly zero right
now.
Thanks,
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
