From: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> Probe memory (INT 15h: E820, E801, 88). Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> --- arch/i386/boot/memory.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/i386/boot/memory.c diff --git a/arch/i386/boot/memory.c b/arch/i386/boot/memory.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a2e62d --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/i386/boot/memory.c @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +/* -*- linux-c -*- ------------------------------------------------------- * + * + * Copyright (C) 1991, 1992 Linus Torvalds + * Copyright 2007 rPath, Inc. - All Rights Reserved + * + * This file is part of the Linux kernel, and is made available under + * the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. + * + * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- */ + +/* + * arch/i386/boot/memory.c + * + * Memory detection code + */ + +#include "boot.h" + +#define SMAP 0x534d4150 /* ASCII "SMAP" */ + +static int detect_memory_e820(void) +{ + u32 next = 0; + u32 size, id; + u8 err; + struct e820entry *desc = boot_params.e820_map; + + do { + size = sizeof(struct e820entry); + id = SMAP; + asm("int $0x15; setc %0" + : "=am" (err), "+b" (next), "+d" (id), "+c" (size), + "=m" (*desc) + : "D" (desc), "a" (0xe820)); + + if (err || id != SMAP) + break; + + boot_params.e820_entries++; + desc++; + } while (next && boot_params.e820_entries < E820MAX); + + return boot_params.e820_entries; +} + +static int detect_memory_e801(void) +{ + u16 ax, bx, cx, dx; + u8 err; + + bx = cx = dx = 0; + ax = 0xe801; + asm("stc; int $0x15; setc %0" + : "=m" (err), "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx), "+c" (cx), "+d" (dx)); + + if (err) + return -1; + + /* Do we really need to do this? */ + if (cx || dx) { + ax = cx; + bx = dx; + } + + if (ax > 15*1024) + return -1; /* Bogus! */ + + /* This ignores memory above 16MB if we have a memory hole + there. If someone actually finds a machine with a memory + hole at 16MB and no support for 0E820h they should probably + generate a fake e820 map. */ + boot_params.alt_mem_k = (ax == 15*1024) ? (dx << 6)+ax : ax; + + return 0; +} + +static int detect_memory_88(void) +{ + u16 ax; + u8 err; + + ax = 0x8800; + asm("stc; int $0x15; setc %0" : "=bcdm" (err), "+a" (ax)); + + boot_params.screen_info.ext_mem_k = ax; + + return -err; +} + +int detect_memory(void) +{ + if (detect_memory_e820() > 0) + return 0; + + if (!detect_memory_e801()) + return 0; + + return detect_memory_88(); +} -- 1.5.2.2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 01/33] x86 setup: MAINTAINERS: formally take responsibility for the i386 boot code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 02/33] hd.c: remove BIOS/CMOS queries
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 03/33] include/asm-i386/boot.h: This is <asm/boot.h>, not <linux/boot.h>
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 04/33] Unify the CPU features vectors between i386 and x86-64
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 05/33] Change CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_MODEL to CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 06/33] Clean up struct screen_info (<linux/screen_info.h>)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 07/33] Use a new CPU feature word to cover all Intel features that are spread around
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 08/33] Define zero-page offset 0x1e4 as a scratch field, and use it
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 09/33] Make definitions for struct e820entry and struct e820map consistent
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 10/33] Make struct boot_params a real structure, and remove obsolete fields
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 11/33] x86-64: add CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN for consistency with i386
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 12/33] x86-64: add symbolic constants for the boot segment selectors
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 14/33] Top header file for new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 15/33] Simple bitops for the new x86 setup code.
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 17/33] A20 handling code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 18/33] APM probing code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 19/33] Command-line parsing code for the new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 20/33] Console-writing code for the new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 21/33] Version string for the new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 22/33] CPU features verification for the new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 23/33] EDD probing code for the new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 24/33] MCA support for new x86 setup code
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised
- Prev by Date: [x86 setup 22/33] CPU features verification for the new x86 setup code
- Next by Date: [x86 setup 24/33] MCA support for new x86 setup code
- Previous by thread: [x86 setup 24/33] MCA support for new x86 setup code
- Next by thread: [x86 setup 26/33] Voyager support for the new x86 setup code
- Index(es):