* Linus Torvalds ([email protected]) wrote: > I'm hoping your Debian/sid gcc version is some very experimental > known-buggy one, and not something that people _expect_ to be solid and > work well? No such luck. :( Debian's close to moving to gcc-4.2 as the default compiler in sid. We've rebuilt the archive a number of times (both since the 4.2 release and during its development) using gcc-4.2 and thought we'd identified most of the issues with it. It clearly sounds like we need to open a high-severity bug on this issue and track it down before we move to it as the default compiler. I'll start harassing the appropriate folks also. Stefano, can you file that bug, including the config, dmesg, and backtrace from gcc if you can get it? Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- References:
- Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.22 released
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
- Next by Date: Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- Index(es):
 |