Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and shared-subtree

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:56:02AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Is that conjecture, or do you have evidence to that effect?  Most users 
> of this file are using it via the glibc interfaces, and there probably 
> aren't all that many users of it in the first place.

I have written parsers for personal projects that might not have been
happy to deal with additional fields myself for example..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and shared-subtree
    • From: Ram Pai <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hibernation Redesign
• Next by Date: Re: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
• Previous by thread: 2.6.22 libata problem: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and shared-subtree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]