Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:41:19AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:I'd support an ununofficial rule that submitters of new syscalls also raise a patch against LTP, come to that...s/ununofficial//, please. And extend this to every new kernel interface that's not bound to a specific piece of hardware.
Agree, and cc manpages maintainer too? (preferably write most of the manpage body as well, IMO). -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Re: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] more about numa_node with struct device
- Previous by thread: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- Next by thread: Re: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
- Index(es):
 |