> > But myself, nor any other developers, are going to review your work
> > any faster if you do things like try to slip things in behind the
> > maintainer's back as you attempted to do yesterday by asking Andrew to
> > put your AF_UNIX garbage collector rewrite directly into his -mm tree.
>
> mmm... I didn't see it as a slip-behind-the-back thing. More a "park it
> in -mm for a bit of concurrent testing and so it doesn't get lost and so I
> don't have to worry about it any more" thing. Plenty of that goes on.
Exactly. I have CC-ed everyone involved, and clearly stated that I do
want it reviewed. There wasn't any evil intention.
I _am_ slightly pissed off by still not having this bug fixed after
two months, and after spending considerable effort at hunting it down
and finding a solution for it (actually three different solutions by
now).
This may seem low priority and irrelevant, but it _is_ a bug, and it's
affecting a real world application. So please take that into
consideration.
Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
