On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 07:26:10PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > BTW. some advanced congestion algorithms like HBO may find these ticket
> > locks useful because you can see immediately how many CPUs are contending
> > the lock, and spinners know how many CPUs are in front of them. That info
> > could be fed into the spin backoff scheme.
>
> That would mean having to keep a lot of status information for a spinlock.
> Gets pretty complicated.
Did you look at the implementation? It takes 2 bytes on x86 and is almost
the same code size and speed as the existing locks.
> The RT tree already converts spinlocks to sleeping locks? If we want to be
> that complicated then maybe going with one sophisticated lock type for all
> would be the solution.
I don't want to convert spinlocks to sleeping locks though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
