Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:27:40 +1000
Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> wrote:

> We did come up with an order that worked for everybody, but that
> discussion seemed to get totally ignored by the ext4 developers.

It was a long discussion.

Can someone please remind us what the signature of the syscall
(and the compat handler) should be?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

• References:
  • -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
  • Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
• Next by Date: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
• Previous by thread: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
• Next by thread: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]