On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:27:40 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> wrote: > We did come up with an order that worked for everybody, but that > discussion seemed to get totally ignored by the ext4 developers. It was a long discussion. Can someone please remind us what the signature of the syscall (and the compat handler) should be? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
- Next by Date: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
- Previous by thread: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
- Next by thread: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
- Index(es):
 |