Re: [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.

Nope.  The builtins not only vary between gcc versions, but they also

have a nasty tendency to generate calls to library functions, sometimes

libgcc functions.  Hence -ffreestanding.

-ffreestanding will still generate calls to libgcc functions.
-ffreestanding doesn't disable _all_ of the C library, either.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 01/33] x86 setup: MAINTAINERS: formally take responsibility for the i386 boot code
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 02/33] hd.c: remove BIOS/CMOS queries
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 03/33] include/asm-i386/boot.h: This is <asm/boot.h>, not <linux/boot.h>
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 04/33] Unify the CPU features vectors between i386 and x86-64
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 05/33] Change CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_MODEL to CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 06/33] Clean up struct screen_info (<linux/screen_info.h>)
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 07/33] Use a new CPU feature word to cover all Intel features that are spread around
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 08/33] Define zero-page offset 0x1e4 as a scratch field, and use it
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 09/33] Make definitions for struct e820entry and struct e820map consistent
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 10/33] Make struct boot_params a real structure, and remove obsolete fields
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 11/33] x86-64: add CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN for consistency with i386
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 12/33] x86-64: add symbolic constants for the boot segment selectors
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 14/33] Top header file for new x86 setup code
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 15/33] Simple bitops for the new x86 setup code.
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] include private data mappings in RLIMIT_DATA limit
• Next by Date: Re: Concerning a post that you made about expandable anonymous shared mappings
• Previous by thread: Re: [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
• Next by thread: Re: [x86 setup 16/33] String-handling functions for the new x86 setup code.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]