~ 1% on 4-way x86_64 http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.elm3b6.png ~ 4% on 16-way NUMA-Q (i386) http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.moe.png ~ 1.5% on 4-way i386 http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.elm3b132.png There's readprofiles and stuff available from here: http://test.kernel.org/functional/index.html if you drill down under the tests marked "regression", eg. http://test.kernel.org/abat/98796/002.kernbench.test/profiling/profile.text M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?)
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?)
- Prev by Date: Re: Determine version of kernel that produced vmcore
- Next by Date: ata and netdev (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] PHY fixed driver: rework release path and update phy_id notation
- Next by thread: Re: Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?)
- Index(es):
 |