Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> I'm a bit surprised about the claim w.r.t. -fno-unit-at-a-time (although
> I guess that is the default and one would thus typically not see this.)
>  Got any pointers why that would cause a global asm() to be scrambled
> around?
> 

Never mind.  It's quite right there in the gcc doc, and
-fno-unit-at-a-time is documented as the fix.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- x86 setup code rewrite in C
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
  - From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
Previous by thread: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
Next by thread: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]