Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> I'm a bit surprised about the claim w.r.t. -fno-unit-at-a-time (although
> I guess that is the default and one would thus typically not see this.)
>  Got any pointers why that would cause a global asm() to be scrambled
> around?
> 

Never mind.  It's quite right there in the gcc doc, and
-fno-unit-at-a-time is documented as the fix.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • x86 setup code rewrite in C
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
    • From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
  • Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
• Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
• Previous by thread: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
• Next by thread: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]