* Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote:
> How do you feel about some variant of this going into 2.6.23-rc1? I
> initially thought of this as a 2.6.24 thing, but as it now looks
> solid, maybe we can hurry things along.
yeah, fine by me. You were working on a more generic patch, right? I
think a good approach would be an atomic notifier chain.
> If Shaohua ports his spinlock->mutex convertion to the sched branch,
> we get some real benefits:
>
> - reduced latencies for desktop users
> - less kvm patches to carry in -rt (maybe none?)
yeah, and i think we can reach 'none'.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
