Re: [-mm PATCH 6/8] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v2)

> Add the meta_page to the per container LRU. The reclaim algorithm has been
> modified to make the isolate_lru_pages() as a pluggable component. The
> scan_control data structure now accepts the container on behalf of which
> reclaims are carried out. try_to_free_pages() has been extended to become
> container aware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

it seems that the number of pages to scan (nr_active/nr_inactive
in shrink_zone) is calculated from NR_ACTIVE and NR_INACTIVE of the zone,
even in the case of per-container reclaim.  is it intended?

YAMAMOTO Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [-mm PATCH 6/8] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v2)
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [-mm PATCH 6/8] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v2)
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm PATCH 4/8] Memory controller memory accounting (v2)
• Next by Date: Re: [-mm PATCH 4/8] Memory controller memory accounting (v2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH 6/8] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v2)
• Next by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH 6/8] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]