Re: [PATCH 1/4] try parent numa_node at first before using default

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:31:02PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [PATCH 1/4] try parent numa_node at first before using default
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index dd40d78..c344d82 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -547,6 +547,8 @@ static void klist_children_put(struct klist_node *n)
>  
>  void device_initialize(struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	int node;
> +
>  	kobj_set_kset_s(dev, devices_subsys);
>  	kobject_init(&dev->kobj);
>  	klist_init(&dev->klist_children, klist_children_get,
> @@ -557,7 +559,9 @@ void device_initialize(struct device *dev)
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev->devres_lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->devres_head);
>  	device_init_wakeup(dev, 0);
> -	set_dev_node(dev, -1);
> +
> +	node = dev->parent ? dev_to_node(dev->parent) : -1;
> +	set_dev_node(dev, node);
>  }

What is this going to give us?

Doesn't it mean that all devices will end up on the same node?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/