On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > 2) given how long profiling has been around, it's just as pointless to
> > keep categorizing it as EXPERIMENTAL, so drop all EXPERIMENTAL labels
> > and dependencies.
>
> Only because something has been around for a while, even for years,
> it doesn't automatically loose "experimental" status. It does when
> it has been extensively and successfully debugged, verified and
> tested, and no reservations regarding run-time stability or
> userspace interface stability remain. Is this true for these
> profiling options?
i have no idea. that's why i listed the patch as "RFC". i was hoping
to get some feedback.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
