Re: [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:45:46 -0700
Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Too trivial, sorry: we could generate 8 million patches like this.
> 
> Would you rather have one big patch that fixes a lot of this type of
> stuff, or not have these types of patches at all ?

I guess one-patch-per-subsystem-maintainer would be best.

Sent To: that maintainer, Cc:'d to me, ideally.  Some will resist.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
• Next by Date: Re: Reiser @ wired.com
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]