Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:03:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> "extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3,
> and "static inline" is correct here.

The idea was to have a linker error in case gcc should deciede for some
reason not to inline this function which as I understand will continue
to be the behaviour of gcc 4.3?

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
  - From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <[email protected]>

References:
- [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Please revert 21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux
Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]