Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:03:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> "extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3,
> and "static inline" is correct here.

The idea was to have a linker error in case gcc should deciede for some
reason not to inline this function which as I understand will continue
to be the behaviour of gcc 4.3?

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
    • From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Please revert 21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux
• Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] include/asm-mips/processor.h: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]