On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:02 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > But I'm not sure it's a good idea in the long run. Think of a printer
> > > > daemon, for example. It shouldn't have to experience unexpected I/O
> > > > problems merely because someone has decided to put the system to sleep.
> > >
> > > Why not ? Printer is offline when machine is asleep... trying to print
>
> ...filesystems are offline, too, when the machine is asleep. Yet,
> unmounting everything on suspend would not result in useful suspend
> support.
>
> Yes, I believe we should be transparent.
You just compared apple and oranges... Try printing and half way through
the page, suspend your USB bus, and see how the printer reacts.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
