Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)

Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb Miklos Szeredi:
> In that case the "we need suspend to be invisible to userspace" as a
> reason to use the freezer would also be moot, since if you don't
> schedule userspace after offlining the CPUs, it can't notice this.

After? Can you do the offlining atomically?

	Regards
		Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
  • Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 17/20] SMP: Implement on_cpu()
• Previous by thread: Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
• Next by thread: Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]