On Sunday 08 July 2007 20:14:04 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:27:55 -0400 Daniel Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:25:31 -0400 Daniel Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> This patch solves a 2.6.20.11 (and 2.6.21) regression added by the patch
> > >> titled "x86: Don't probe for DDC on VBE1.2"
> > >>
> > >> The regression caused the screen resolution to be incorrectly adjusted
> > >> by 6 pixels. This patch makes it go back to normal again.
> > >>
> > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181067
> > >>
> > >> Please apply this patch or discuss further :)
> > >
> > > Well drat. I didn't merge the patch because it conflicts with
> > > git-newsetup, and Peter believes that git-newsetup already contains an
> > > equivalent fix. Testing 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 would confirm that. Please.
> >
> > 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 has the same problem (it is not fixed there).
> >
>
> Well damn, we've let this slide for too long.
>
> Guys, 2.6.22 is days away. Do we think that the below is safe to merge
> now?
I feel uneasy with the patch that late and i don't think the bug is
particularly critical.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
