Re: [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by BIOS

Roland Dreier wrote:

seems like we probably want this for 2.6.22... it fixes a panic that
I've seen actually reported by several users.  Is there any risk to
merging it?

i guess getting it into 2.6.22.1 would be OK too.

Well, there were reports of miscompiles with the original patch. This one is hopefully fixed. I'll wait a day or two and upstream it.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/20] KVM updates for 2.6.23, part 2
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by BIOS
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by BIOS
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by BIOS
• Next by Date: Re: [lm-sensors] [2.6 patch] make coretemp_device_remove() static
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 11/20] KVM: SVM: Reliably detect if SVM was disabled by BIOS
• Next by thread: [PATCH 09/20] KVM: MMU: Fix Wrong tlb flush order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]