Hello.
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
This updates relevant platform code
(freescale mpc8349itx target) to make the CompactFlash
work in TrueIDE mode.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <[email protected]>
It would have been good if you tried to actualy compile your code. ;-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts
index db0d003..b3e80ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#size-cells = <1>;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
device_type = "soc";
- ranges = <0 e0000000 00100000>;
+ ranges = <0 e0000000 1f000000>;
reg = <e0000000 00000200>;
bus-frequency = <0>; // from bootloader
@@ -229,6 +229,21 @@
descriptor-types-mask = <01010ebf>;
};
+ ide@10000000 {
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
Hm, why define that prop for a node with no children?
+ interrupts = <17 8>;
+ interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 700 17 8>;
+ interrupt-map-mask = <0>;
+
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
Same question here.
+ reg = <10000000 10 10000200 10>;
+
+ device_type = "ide";
I think that already adopted device type is "ata", not "ide".
+ compatible = "mmio-ide";
+ interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
+ };
+
ipic: pic@700 {
interrupt-controller;
#address-cells = <0>;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
index cad1757..b3fe011 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
@@ -1103,3 +1103,116 @@ err:
arch_initcall(cpm_smc_uart_of_init);
#endif /* CONFIG_8xx */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MPC834x_ITX
Erm, isn't this stuff misplaced? Is this really SoC device? I remember
seeng this in the arch/ppc/ platform code before (in the internal tree)...
+#include <linux/ide.h>
+#include <linux/mmio-ide.h>
+#include <asm-ppc/mpc83xx.h>
+
+static void mmio_ide_outsw(unsigned long port, void *addr, u32 count)
+{
+ _outsw_ns((void __iomem *)port, addr, count);
+}
+
+static void mmio_ide_insw(unsigned long port, void *addr, u32 count)
+{
+ _insw_ns((void __iomem *)port, addr, count);
+}
+
+void mmio_ide_mmiops (ide_hwif_t *hwif)
+{
+ default_hwif_mmiops(hwif);
+ hwif->OUTL = NULL;
OUTL() method no longer exists.
+ hwif->OUTSW = mmio_ide_outsw;
+ hwif->OUTSL = NULL;
+ hwif->INL = NULL;
And neither INL() does.
+ hwif->INSW = mmio_ide_insw;
+ hwif->INSL = NULL;
+}
+
+void mmio_ide_selectproc (ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+ u8 stat;
+
+ stat = drive->hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
+ if ((stat & READY_STAT) && (stat & BUSY_STAT))
+ drive->present = 0;
+ else
+ drive->present = 1;
+}
+
Heh, attempt to emulate hotplug. :-)
+static int __init fsl_mmio_ide_of_init(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (np = NULL, i = 0;
+ (np = of_find_compatible_node(np, "ide", "mmio-ide")) != NULL;
+ i++) {
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct resource res[3];
+ struct platform_device *pdev = NULL;
+ static struct mmio_ide_platform_data pdata = {
+ /* TODO: pass via OF? */
+ .byte_lanes_swapping = 0,
+ .regaddr_step = 2,
+ .mmiops = mmio_ide_mmiops,
+ .selectproc = mmio_ide_selectproc,
Definitely, you won't be able to pass methods via of_platform_device. :-)
+ };
+
+ memset(res, 0, sizeof(res));
+
+ ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res[0]);
+ if (ret) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "mmio-ide.%d: unable to get "
+ "resource from OF\n",i );
CodingStyle: space after comma, no space before paren.
[...]
+ res[2].name = "mmio-ide";
+ res[2].flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ;;
One ; too many here. ;-)
MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
