Hi to all,
I've been playing with modules programing and got the
following
[21353.012000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
f0e56500
[21353.012000] printing eip:
[21353.012000] c01aaf29
[21353.012000] *pde = 2852b067
[21353.012000] *pte = 00000000
[21353.012000] Oops: 0000 [#1]
[21353.012000] Modules linked in: fglrx(P) pcmcia rtc_cmos rtc_core rtc_lib
yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic bcm43xx ieee80211softmac tifm_7xx1 tifm_core sdhci
snd_atiixp_modem snd_atiixp snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus k8temp pcspkr ati_agp
agpgart shpchp i2c_piix4 tsdev joydev
[21353.012000] CPU: 0
[21353.012000] EIP: 0060:[<c01aaf29>] Tainted: P VLI
[21353.012000] EFLAGS: 00010286 (2.6.21.3 #1)
[21353.012000] EIP is at proc_get_inode+0x29/0x160
[21353.012000] eax: f0e56500 ebx: d3b51a40 ecx: 00000000 edx: f0000268
[21353.012000] esi: f0000268 edi: efe81800 ebp: d3b51a40 esp: c6987da0
[21353.012000] ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
[21353.012000] Process ls (pid: 10054, ti=c6986000 task=ee064e90
task.ti=c6986000)
[21353.012000] Stack: 00100000 c6987db0 c170f6b8 c6987f04 f0000268 c20224e7
d3b51a97 c01aeea1
[21353.012000] c2022478 efe85e50 c6987f04 c2022478 efe85e50 c6987e38
c01ab219 c06e0920
[21353.012000] c2022478 c6987f04 c017b218 c6987e44 c1713dc0 efe85e50
efe85ec8 c6987e38
[21353.012000] Call Trace:
[21353.012000] [<c01aeea1>] proc_lookup+0x81/0xe0
[21353.012000] [<c01ab219>] proc_root_lookup+0x19/0x50
[21353.012000] [<c017b218>] do_lookup+0x148/0x190
[21353.012000] [<c017d2d5>] __link_path_walk+0x835/0xe10
[21353.012000] [<c017d8f3>] link_path_walk+0x43/0xc0
[21353.012000] [<c018017f>] filldir64+0xbf/0xe0
[21353.012000] [<c01ae272>] proc_readdir+0xc2/0x1a0
[21353.012000] [<c017db66>] do_path_lookup+0x86/0x210
[21353.012000] [<c017c8da>] getname+0x9a/0xf0
[21353.012000] [<c017e57b>] __user_walk_fd+0x3b/0x60
[21353.012000] [<c01773cf>] vfs_lstat_fd+0x1f/0x50
[21353.012000] [<c018017f>] filldir64+0xbf/0xe0
[21353.012000] [<c01ae272>] proc_readdir+0xc2/0x1a0
[21353.012000] [<c017744f>] sys_lstat64+0xf/0x30
[21353.012000] [<c01800c0>] filldir64+0x0/0xe0
[21353.012000] [<c0180305>] vfs_readdir+0x85/0xb0
[21353.012000] [<c01803e2>] sys_getdents64+0xb2/0xd0
[21353.012000] [<c0103f08>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x81
[21353.012000] =======================
[21353.012000] Code: 00 00 57 89 c7 56 89 d6 53 89 cb 83 ec 10 85 c9 74 28 ff 41
48 8b 49 4c 85 c9 0f 85 09 01 00 00 85 db 74 16 8b 43 2c 85 c0 74 0f <83> 38 02
0f 84 e3 00 00 00 ff 80 80 01 00 00 89 f2 89 f8 e8 3f
[21353.012000] EIP: [<c01aaf29>] proc_get_inode+0x29/0x160 SS:ESP 0068:c6987da0
Actually my module has a bug - it don't remove a proc file has been
created on module init function. And right after I've my buggy module
unloaded (note the proc entry remained and owned by noone)
ls /proc caused that oops.
So the question is - is it normal behaviour of the kernel?
I've taken a look for kernel sources and found the following
in module.h
static inline int try_module_get(struct module *module)
{
int ret = 1;
^^^^^^^^^^^^
if (module) {
unsigned int cpu = get_cpu();
if (likely(module_is_live(module)))
local_inc(&module->ref[cpu].count);
else
ret = 0;
put_cpu();
}
return ret;
}
and it seems ret shouldn't be set to 1 by defaults. I bet
proc_lookup
[which has the following]
if (de != NULL && !try_module_get(de->owner))
should return NULL for a such module. Am I wrong?
Cyrill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
