cpufreq 'choice' Kconfig oddness in 2.6.22-rc6-mm1..

So I was looking at drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig, and wondering...

Is there a specific reason why we have a 'choice' clause that allows selecting
'performance' or 'userspace' as the default governor, and no obvious way to
select powersave, ondemand, or conservative as a default? Or was this an
oversight I should cook up a patch for?  Looks like the Kconfig and a bit
of cut-n-paste in include/linux/cpufreq.h is all that's needed?

Attachment: pgpfKyWOOzSeA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: cpufreq 'choice' Kconfig oddness in 2.6.22-rc6-mm1..
    • From: Mattia Dongili <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6.22 regression fix] DLM must depend on SYSFS
• Next by Date: Re: state of stack patches
• Previous by thread: [2.6.22 regression fix] DLM must depend on SYSFS
• Next by thread: Re: cpufreq 'choice' Kconfig oddness in 2.6.22-rc6-mm1..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]