Hi. On Saturday 07 July 2007 08:56:21 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 6 July 2007 22:26, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > This patch makes the freezer skip uninterruptible user space tasks (ie. such > > > that have an mm of their own) when counting the tasks to be frozen. As a > > > result, these tasks have the TIF_FREEZE and TIF_SIGPENDING flags set, but the > > > freezer doesn't wait for them to enter the refrigerator. Nevertheless, they > > > will enter the refrigerator as soon as they change their state. > > > > A small correction: they will enter the refrigerator on return to user-space. > > Yes, I should have written that explicitly. > > > Actually, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE doesn't mean the task actually sleeps. It could > > be running or preempted... I am a bit worried :) > > Fortunately, similar approach has been tested quite extensively by suspend2, > IIRC. :-) That's right. I used to signal TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE (I take it the INTERRUPTIBLE above is a typo) tasks, but ignore them when deciding whether freezing was successful. I've since dropped those modifications, but only because I'm actively trying to get closer to mainline. Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Christian Reformed Church of Cobden 103 Curdie Street, Cobden 3266, Victoria, Australia Ph. +61 3 5595 1185 / +61 417 100 574 Communal Worship: 11 am Sunday.
Attachment:
pgpEwjA4KjnYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] Freezer: Handle uninterruptible tasks
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] Freezer: Handle uninterruptible tasks
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] Freezer: Handle uninterruptible tasks
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT (aka software PAGE_SIZE)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] Freezer: Handle uninterruptible tasks
- Next by thread: Question about pm and tty
- Index(es):