On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 10:55 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > I already fixed that. Patch is in Andrew's tree. > > > > Oh good. I actually got build problems from that due to a powerpc64 gcc > > bug so... :) > > Well in that case we may have to push the patch into 2.6.22 or stable. Dunno. I had three such errors and have sent patches for all of them, DaveM just accepted one, Paulus hasn't said anything yet and this was the third. Olaf said the GCC PR is http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490 and it seems to fit. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- Prev by Date: Re: Liunx power consumption on laptops -- Enormous progress in the last few months
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] memory unplug v7 - migration by kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: don't export static kmem_cache_open
- Index(es):