Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:14 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:

> Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must.

This I still disagree upon. Page-cache limits are orthogonal to
containers and not a requirement for containers. If you want such a
feature get it in Linux proper and don't sneak it in the backdoor via
containers.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
  - From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>

References:
- [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
  - From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: SD card readable only up to certain boundary (samcop sdi controller)
Next by Date: [PATCH RT] don't BUG_ON in exit for in_interrupt
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
Next by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]