On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, DervishD wrote:
> * Bodo Eggert <[email protected]> dixit:
> > Standardisation is good, but autotools (as they are used) usurally isn't.
>
> Usually, by picking other's project configure.in and tweak blindly.
If it were that easy to write a correct automake script, people would do
that. Wouldn't they?
> > Configuring the build of an autotools program is harder than nescensary;
> > if it used a config file, you could easily save it somewhere while adding
> > comments on how and why you did *that* choice, and you could possibly
> > use a set of default configs which you'd just include.
>
> Looks like CMake...
Obviously something I should look at.
--
Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say:
45. Was that YOUR directory?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
