Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

> > You're missing the point. I'm arguing that a sync from within the freezer 
> > should guarantee that there is no data loss.
> 
> Well, it should, but it doesn't ...
> 
> Moreover, if FUSE implements syncing, then the sync from within the freezer
> will almost certainly deadlock.

Rafael, think positively: by the time fuse implements sync(), the
freezer will be long gone ;)

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
  - From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] lib/ioremap.c should #include <linux/io.h>
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]