Hi Kyle. On Friday 06 July 2007 15:01:48 Kyle Moffett wrote: > On Jul 06, 2007, at 00:03:15, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > The kind of thing Linus was talking about would limit you (as > > swsusp and uswsusp do now) to only half the amount of memory. > > How so? Suppose hibernate is implemented like this: You're not talking about the same thing Linus was suggesting. He was just wanting a result = sys_snapshot() sort of call. That would limit us to half the amount of memory. I've looked over what you've written below and want to consider it in detail. Right now though, I don't have the time. I'll try to get back to you promptly. Nigel -- See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing lists, wiki and bugzilla info.
Attachment:
pgp1BLyNqFm02.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: Valgrinding the kernel?
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):
 |