Re: [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2007-07-05 20:43:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 July 2007 01:25, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > > > > > > Beep_flags should be removed too if you're sticking with /proc.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Fixed.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ta.  But you didn't answer the question - why /proc and not sysfs?
> > > > 
> > > > Do you seriously advocate setting two bits of one variable from /proc,
> > > > and one more bit from /sys?
> > > 
> > > That's partly why I had a separate variable - retaining proc only because it's 
> > > existing functionality, using sysfs for the new code. Remember, too, that 
> > 
> > /proc is not deprecated _that_ much, and notice that this is sysctl,
> > not regular procfs code.
> > 
> > Yes, I see why you did it that way, but I also think you overdisgned
> > it a bit. 
> 
> Hmm, what about adding a second interface to acpi_realmode_flags in sysfs, in
> a separate patch, and scheduling the old one, in /proc, for removal?

Well.. it is sysctl... so we already have separate interface,
sysctl(). Yes, sysctl will probably move to /sys one day, but that is
probably bigger project than just suspend.
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux