On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:50, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > Don't you think, however, that it can be modified a little to play well,
> > > > for example, with the freezer?
> > >
> > > I could stick a couple of try_to_freeze()s into fuse, and that would
> > > make suspend failure less likely. But making problems less easy to
> > > reproduce is not a good thing.
> >
> > So, how about eliminating them?
>
> That can't be done just within fuse, a process might be sleeping on a
> VFS mutex. Do we want to hack VFS as well?
No.
> I guess I know your answer. But it ain't gonna work. Suspend code
> really doesn't belong in VFS, and I'm pretty sure the maintainers of
> that little piece of code would agree with me on this.
Surprise, surprise. Not that I'm scared of the VFS maintainers, though. ;-)
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
