Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > It seems pretty clear cut. Whining about how much problems this will > > cause won't get us nearer to a solution. > > Yes, that's pretty clear cut, but we should start from fixing the drivers. :-) If, at a minimum, we can determine that we can STD without a freezer. It makes no sense to invest a lot of work to face the same problem again with STD. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- References:
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):
 |