On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 14:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Remember what I wrote a few minutes ago about khubd and ksuspend_usbd > > > wanting to resume devices during a system suspend transition? This is > > > exactly what happens when those threads aren't frozen. > > > > So, I wonder why I don't see that error on my powerbook? > > Because you have only one CPU running while your suspend code is being > executed? If that's really all the problem then what's wrong with just unplugging the other CPUs earlier? Sure, that makes suspend no longer perfectly transparent since userspace might notice the CPUs being unplugged, but it has to cope with that anyway since a user can do it manually... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- References:
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):