> Don't you think, however, that it can be modified a little to play well, > for example, with the freezer? I could stick a couple of try_to_freeze()s into fuse, and that would make suspend failure less likely. But making problems less easy to reproduce is not a good thing. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- References:
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] FRV: Remove some dead code [try #2]
- Next by Date: Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):
![]() |