On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> You could of course make this STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT() and place it
> near lockdep_init_map() :-)
>
> That way it would be clear that changes to either ought to be reflected
> in the other.
Sure. I have to repost anyway :)
How about
+/* both _name and _key must not be NULL */
+#define STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT(_name, _key) \
+ { .name = (_name), .key = (_key), }
That'll still require some #ifdef foo inside workqueue.h but I think
it's cleaner to put just this into lockdep.h
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- References:
- [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] configfs: Miscellaneous cleanups
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] debug work struct cancel deadlocks with lockdep
- Index(es):
 |